SCHIFFY case · Supporting evidence
1,400 other launches, bought the same way
A wider operation, visible in the records. These are the other tokens where the same 16 launch buyers made coordinated entries, from Jul 27 to Oct 28, 2026, across 1,150 deployers. None were launched by the five team wallets tested. This pattern does not identify the operator.
1,400launches passing the entry test
1,076also took 1%+ of supply and sold 90%+
431came before $SCHIFFY existed
1,184bought faster than $SCHIFFY's 263s (median: 65s)
How a launch qualifies
- At least 6 of the 16 wallets each send their own swap transaction in a single block, through the same router and method.
- That block is within 10 minutes of the token's first mint, with no earlier mint.
- "Full pattern" also requires at least 1% of supply at peak, at least 90% of purchases sold, and a block with 6+ of the wallets selling together.
$SCHIFFY passes as the control, at 263 seconds, 8.76% peak and 100% sold, and is excluded from these 1,400 rows. The count requires 6+ of these specific wallets in one block. Data runs through block 104549114 (Nov 2, 2026). A known offensive token symbol is masked in the table; the raw downloads preserve on-chain symbols. Time-to-exit and no-sell gaps are estimates from block numbers.
| Token | First buy (UTC) | After mint | Wallets | Peak supply | Sold | Longest no-sell gap | Verify |
|---|